Another note on child pornography
One can perhaps make a reasonable case that taking pornographic photos of children should be illegal and immoral. I’d be more tempted to agree to that.
But the mere posession of such photographs? After that the damage has been done. Why should it be illegal to own the photo if you’re not the one who took it?
because you’re creating a potential market and audience for the child’s humiliation, degradation and abuse
-
thecheekylibertarian liked this
-
zwerven reblogged this from logicallypositive and added:
exactly familiar with what...contained in child pornography … um.. any
-
probablyharrison liked this
-
atomicgrandfatherclock said:
With that logic, why should it be illegal to have drugs when you were not the one to make them?
-
logicallypositive posted this
